Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2020 13:22:28 GMT
Hey management, boring guy failed the Whoppie test. Can you show him the door? mommy, the mean guy is teasing me for being mean to others and being a complete dullard! Guess I’m winning
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2020 13:25:13 GMT
Poor baby can’t take a dose of their own medicine, obviously not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2020 13:26:38 GMT
Hey management, boring guy failed the Whoppie test. Can you show him the door? And you failed the any sign of a shred of intelligence test....lol
|
|
|
Post by braindead on Jan 12, 2020 13:35:03 GMT
Ron,is that you?
|
|
|
Post by My Avatar Is A Hot Babe on Oct 12, 2021 17:29:34 GMT
I'm sure I'll enjoy this new release, but it does seem that Giles IS a bit clueless at times. Does he REALLY think that Suzy (Mrs.) Parker is NOT a fun little tune? He mentions relatively poor quality but they use NAGRA tapes quite a bit on this set.... why not THIS one? NO fast versions of Two Of Us? The film version is great fun, even though it's edited (well done though) but is an early highlight of the film. It also shows how much the song evolved over time. There are several "fast" versions that would have been a nice treat for the "sandals" crowds and newbies alike. No oldies?? A bit of a head-scratcher for me. Gone, Gone, Gone, Not Fade Away, Black Dog Blues and several others would have been nice... and all performed much better than the oldies medley seen in the film. We get a snatch of Paul singing Wake Up Little Susie from the I Me Mine sessions, but not the complete version of Peggy Sue Got Married from the same session. WHY? And no dialog from the Let It Be overdub session? The final Beatles session proper. No rehearsals for the backing vocals or George's new solo? Just seems very weird that this is all omitted. Off the beaten path... are the official archives as complete as they once were? Why would bootleg sources "EVER" be used IF the tapes are readily available. Seems very odd to me. Why would the Get Back reprise/coda be EDITED??? It should have included the complete take. It's fun and would have been a treat for anyone who hasn't heard the bootlegs. Many of "us" here have edited the single mono mix with the unedited ending and it's just a nice alternate version of a very familiar song. I just don't know. Last tiny rant, couldn't they have included George's lovely demo of Isn't It A Pity? Only available as an mp3 downloadable bonus track on George's Let It Roll comp? I truly hope Jackson's documentary film contains MUCH more unreleased music and please, please, please show or showcase complete versions and not 20 second samples cobbled together. Ron
|
|
|
Post by respiratoryproblems on Apr 18, 2023 21:30:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sₚⲁᵣₖydₒg on Apr 19, 2023 0:00:36 GMT
You missed the earlier thread where braindead was accusing Wollensack of being a lying troll and that his information was made up. Ron showed his true colors as a consummate asshole and also revealed his non-insider status. forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/capitol-beatles-box-set-vol-2-apr-11-release-date.74288/page-58#post-1693908Capitol Beatles Box Set Vol 2 - Apr 11 Release Date? I might be handed my lunch on this, but since no one has done so...I'm calling you on this. NO WAY, you received the set yet. We ALL know the about the airbrushing, so that's nothing new. The packaging has been discussed on other forums....and all you say is it sounds great, with the caveat that the mono Rubber Soul MAY be a fold down. Saying you can't divulge how you were able to obtain this 2 weeks early And saying Spizer wrote the liner notes just as he did for the first set...sorry man, I just don't believe you. There was not a single "correction" made to any of the unique mixes on Vol. 1 Not a single anomoly from these mixes was altered. Now you're saying NEW fold down mixes have been used? Ted knows his stuff, Spizer knows his stuff...in fact, the press release tells in detail WHAT mixes would be on the set, even touting the horrid duophonic mixes. It's inconceivable this has occurred. If somehow you got an advanced copy, THAT IS A LEGITIMATE SET...perhaps you're listening to the STEREO mixes?? There's no chance in hell that the false start preceeds the mono mix of I'm Looking Through You. And the two other tracks you mention, You Like Me To Much and Norwegian Wood wouldn't have their anomolies on the stereo mixes either....I seriously think something is up here.Sorry Wollensack, I don't know you, and I rarely ever call people out, but I have sources very close to the situation and I find it extremely doubtful you have a legitimate advanced copy. According to my rep at Capitol, the US sets, have not left the pressing plants yet. This may all sound harsh, but I have to write what I believe. Fellow members fear not....Jensen would never make new mono mixes from stereo sources or "fix" anomolies on the masters themselves...this is laughable. Ronbrainwashed, Mar 30, 2006
|
|
|
Post by My Avatar Is A Hot Babe on Aug 15, 2023 17:43:00 GMT
Hey! There was speculation about an announcement. There was speculation about a 29 September release date. No dates confirmed by anyone. Not even our esteemed insiders. The Red and Blue set WILL be released. Now & Then WILL be released. THIS YEAR. Maybe John's birthday )6 Oct. Friday) would be a more viable release date. A mere week later than the speculated release date. Typically there is a six week or slightly longer gap between an OFFICIAL announcement and release date. It's the Apple way! Meaning, a 29 September release date could still happen. Perhaps 9 October or close to it. Any later than that, DO NOT expect an official announcement until the Apple appropriate time. If the release date is say 27 October.... don't expect an announcement until mid-September. Most here know this full well. Kind of strange reading about delays and such. 2024?? Not a chance. Ron
|
|
|
Post by braindead on Aug 15, 2023 18:13:16 GMT
Ron "knows" you know.
|
|
|
Post by gary191265 on Aug 15, 2023 21:40:15 GMT
Hey! There was speculation about an announcement. There was speculation about a 29 September release date. No dates confirmed by anyone. Not even our esteemed insiders. The Red and Blue set WILL be released. Now & Then WILL be released. THIS YEAR. Maybe John's birthday )6 Oct. Friday) would be a more viable release date. A mere week later than the speculated release date. Typically there is a six week or slightly longer gap between an OFFICIAL announcement and release date. It's the Apple way! Meaning, a 29 September release date could still happen. Perhaps 9 October or close to it. Any later than that, DO NOT expect an official announcement until the Apple appropriate time. If the release date is say 27 October.... don't expect an announcement until mid-September. Most here know this full well. Kind of strange reading about delays and such. 2024?? Not a chance. Ron Steven Wilson's new album is out on the 29th September, they're not going to want to go up against that
|
|
|
Post by hoffa_nagila on Aug 15, 2023 22:30:31 GMT
Giles "Cloth-eared Nepo-baby Hack" Martin probably accidentally shift-deleted the song and sessions.
|
|
bradman
Better than Steve
Posts: 5,138
|
Post by bradman on Aug 16, 2023 3:41:49 GMT
More can be flown in.
|
|
daved
Better than Steve
Posts: 10,552
Member is Online
|
Post by daved on Aug 16, 2023 20:38:42 GMT
I don’t get where they are getting all this “suite” and “medley” shit from. It’s a basic song. If they want it to be a hit (it won’t be) the last thing they need is to make it is overly pompous.
|
|
bradman
Better than Steve
Posts: 5,138
|
Post by bradman on Aug 16, 2023 23:18:15 GMT
A rumpshaking megamix is needed.
|
|
|
Post by gobshite on Aug 16, 2023 23:23:47 GMT
I really hope the track gets a same-day news release and streaming release while Maccawings, MikeCarrera et al are pulling their puds thinking about what to reveal next
|
|