|
|
Post by graucho on Feb 8, 2021 0:28:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by powerpoppackage on Feb 8, 2021 2:51:55 GMT
Bingo Bongo is so stupid that I assumed he was trolling at first.
|
|
bradman
Better than Steve
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by bradman on Feb 8, 2021 3:28:43 GMT
Fat Bottom Girls has gotta be the encore.
|
|
|
|
Post by hoffa_nagila on Feb 8, 2021 3:52:10 GMT
Fat Bottom Girls has gotta be the encore. With special guest Aerosmith!! |
|
daved
Better than Steve
Posts: 10,616 
|
Post by daved on Feb 8, 2021 9:47:23 GMT
Bingo Bongo is so stupid that I assumed he was trolling at first. Seriously. He gives rjp a run for his money. |
|
|
|
Post by My Avatar Is A Hot Babe on Feb 8, 2021 19:06:13 GMT
I’ve read that John was planning a world tour to kick off in 81, which led me to think what would a big 80s Lennon World Tour concert set list look like? I’d love it if he brought in some more Beatles tracks and mixed in the solo stuff, much like Macca did (before the Beatles stuff overtook the solo stuff in his setlist). With increased technology he could do pretty much any track he wanted from his back catalogue. Here’s my suggestion set 1. Whatever Gets You Thru The Night Help Day Tripper Instant Karma It’s So Hard Nowhere Man Revolution Woman Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds In My Life Set 2 (Just Like) Starting Over Come Together Mind Games Don’t Let Me Down Gimme Some Truth Watching The Wheels I Feel Fine Across The Universe A Hard Days Night Imagine encore All You Need Is Love Stand By Me Give Peace A Chance Finale Twist And Shout let’s hear your suggestions?! That's a stellar setlist. However, I'd add "If I fell" right after "A hard Day's Night", of course with a surprise visit by Paul McCartney.  A Day In The Life... “ladies and Gentlemen, Mr Paul McCartney!” I think he also would have covered a Paul song just for the heck of it. Nah, Lennon would have divorced Yoko, recorded a solo album with Ringo and Paul on a couple. He would have toured in support of the record, and at the Madison Sq Garden show, Paul, George and Ringo join a three song Beatles encore. mind games i am the walrus remember happiness is a warm gun woman ticket to ride (ringo guest spot) impromptu octopuses garden (co-vocals with ringo) sexy sadie God (acoustic set) just like starting over julia strawberry fields day in the life working class hero imagine (Medley) I feel Fine Anytime at All And Your Bird Can Sing Money Help (incomplete) Ive Got a Feeling ( Paul guest spot) Things We Said Today ( Paul guest spot) I Want to Hold Your Hand ( Paul guest spot) Something (George and Ringo Paul guest spot) All You Need is Love (George and Ringo Paul guest spot) Watching the Wheels (George and Ringo Paul guest spot) |
|
daved
Better than Steve
Posts: 10,616
|
Post by daved on Feb 8, 2021 19:17:59 GMT
Methinks he don't know what impromptu means.
|
|
daved
Better than Steve
Posts: 10,616
|
Post by daved on Feb 8, 2021 19:21:44 GMT
A song he could barely sing in 1965, never mind 1981.
|
|
|
|
Post by respiratoryproblems on Feb 8, 2021 22:56:09 GMT
There’s some proper one-handed typing going on there. A Twist & Shout finale indeed.
All that divorcing Yoko to get back with the lads slashfic is just embarrassing.
|
|
bradman
Better than Steve
Posts: 5,150
|
Post by bradman on Feb 8, 2021 23:08:40 GMT
I love all of the Macca guest spots, co-headliners almost.
|
|
|
|
Post by hugofuguzev on Feb 9, 2021 8:07:30 GMT
Some of these Beatard fuckwits have WAAAAY too much goddamn time on their hands. Hoffman's forum has almost got me to the point now where I actively hate the fucking Beatles, the thought of listening to a Beatles record is almost nauseating to me now. Recordings from the Wings Over America tour are just about the only Beatles related music I can stomach these days...
|
|
|
|
Post by hoffa_nagila on Feb 9, 2021 9:02:37 GMT
For people who seem to care so much about the Beatles, they are incredibly ignorant about actual Beatle information. Slane (one of the good guys) has started a thread or two with some very interesting and informative posts. The replies? Mostly idiotic drivel.
Or, take Wings Over America. That old myth about the album being overdubbed gets repeated constantly. If these idiots cracked a book open once in a while they might learn something. Of course, they can quote some etcetera poats by heart. He's for sure the Q of beatle world.
|
|
|
|
Post by hugofuguzev on Feb 9, 2021 11:11:17 GMT
For people who seem to care so much about the Beatles, they are incredibly ignorant about actual Beatle information. Slane (one of the good guys) has started a thread or two with some very interesting and informative posts. The replies? Mostly idiotic drivel. Or, take Wings Over America. That old myth about the album being overdubbed gets repeated constantly. If these idiots cracked a book open once in a while they might learn something. Of course, they can quote some etcetera poats by heart. He's for sure the Q of beatle world. Slane is definitely one of the few half decent Beatards. I've been calling Etcetera out on his bullshit for years, and, without fail, at least half a dozen Beatards will immediately rise to his defense every time. Fuck them too. Like my wife says, "You got grown men obsessing over this shit as though it actually mattered!"  She's always a good one for perspective... As for Wings Over America, one listen to the audience tapes will tell ya they kept the overdubs on the album to a minimum. But fuck Wings Over America too, Mike Millard's June 23 L.A. Forum tape is everything the official album isn't. |
|
|
|
Post by powerpoppackage on Feb 9, 2021 13:38:59 GMT
Speaking of "Wings Over America", here's the always calm and rational Maccafan missing the point as usual while hyperventilating as usual:
|
|
|
|
Post by braindead on Feb 15, 2021 22:16:50 GMT
BeatlesObsessive said: ↑
wanna hear the Beatles in audiophile quality.. MISERY! 30 ips ... are there any other 30 ips recordings?? You're Mother Should Know alternate take on Anthology? What about This Boy.. how'd they get that bass so unfettered?
Some specs of the Studer J-37:
@ 15 ips.....30 - 15 000 hz +-2db
But it has NO 30 ips speed. Their quarter inch half track/ full track machines did.
No way any recording at 30 ips would get you better bass. 30 ips will get lower wow and flutter and higher signal to noise ratio. But only on a modern post 1969 machine. 20 - 40 hz is the first octave of bass. 40 - 80 hz is the next octave of bass up. Recording at 30 ips with the Studer J-37 (if you could. Say they altered the machine) will lose you 1.25 octaves of bass.
The Scully 284-8 & 284 -12
@ 15 ips.......35 - 15 000 hz +-2db
@ 30 ips.......50 - 15 000 hz +-2db
I suspect you mean a 30 ips mix down. Same rule applies. You run any half inch half track (full track) tape machine at 30 ips you will castrate the bass. Again at 50 hz. You would get a quieter recording but recording at 30 ips will never get you better bass. That is the mix and recording techniques you are hearing.
However, certain speeds will give bass bumps. This happens in multitracks and stereo/mono tape machines. The 30 ips speed might have caused a bass bump of 2 db or so at 80 or 120 hz. For example many bands who record with the JDF 2 inch 8 track head stacks on 24 track machine will run their tape machine at 7.5 ips. Why? With the 2 inch 8 track head stack the 7.5 ips speed will give a severe bass bump at 25 hz! And this is not the kind of effect you could duplicate with an EQ.
Even in the 1970's this was the case.
All the 2 inch 24 tracks from MCI, Scully, Studer to 3M were:
@ 15 ips....... 40 - 20 000 hz +1/ -2db
@ 30 ips....... 50 - 22 000 hz +1 / -2db
Even the famous Studer A800-24 Mark 1 (1973)
Could not fight it:
@ 15 ips....... 30 - 20 000 hz +-2db
@ 30 ips........50 - 22 000 hz +-2db
As you see doubling the speed really did in the low bass. This is why 99% of audio engineers doing popular music did not run their multitracks or stereo recorders at 30 ips. It would crap the bass. Some did. A few engineers hated Dolby 'A' and used the 30 ips speed option to get an extra 2 db of signal to noise ratio. The 30 ips speed option was often used for copying.
This way you didn't gain any noise and kept your top end spiffy. But it never did a anything for bass.
Of course if you went to +1.5 / 3 db the spec wood look like this:
@ 15 ips...... 20 - 21 000 hz
@ 30 ips...... 40 - 23 000 hz
By the mid 1980's most 24 track machines were:
@ 15 ips...... 30 - 21 000 hz +-2db
@ 30 ips.......40 - 23 000 hz +-2db
Or at + 1 / - 3 db
@ 15 ips...... 20 - 22 000 hz
@ 30 ips...... 30 - 24 000 hz
These are all guaranteed specs by the manufacturers I quote. A skilled audio engineer might get more out the these tape machines. But it depends on many factors. This is why I always list the guaranteed specs. So what specs I list you can be sure the tape machine will perform at those frequencies.
john morris, 46 minutes ago#638
DK Pete likes this.
Fucking hell.....fuck off and die,please.
|
|
She's always a good one for perspective...
